{"id":850,"date":"2014-04-22T00:24:48","date_gmt":"2014-04-21T16:24:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/isoc.sg\/?p=850"},"modified":"2014-04-22T00:24:48","modified_gmt":"2014-04-21T16:24:48","slug":"our-feedback-on-the-proposed-amendments-to-the-copyright-act-blocking-websites-isocsg","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/isocsg.org\/index.php\/2014\/04\/22\/our-feedback-on-the-proposed-amendments-to-the-copyright-act-blocking-websites-isocsg\/","title":{"rendered":"Our feedback on the Proposed Amendments to the Copyright Act (Blocking Websites) #isocsg"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>Public Consultation on the Proposed Amendments to the Copyright Act: Feedback at a Meeting Organised by the Internet Society and the Asian Internet Coalition<\/h4>\n<p>Venue: Office of Red Hat, 8 Shenton Way #10-00, AXA Tower<\/p>\n<p>Date: 21 April 2014<\/p>\n<p>Time: 7 pm to 9.15 pm<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Disclaimer: Because of the diversity of those attending, the views expressed should not be taken as representative of those present. Rather, they should be seen as offering a diversity of opinions pointing out the pros, cons, benefits and pitfalls of the proposed amendment.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Attendees:<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"table01\"><\/a><\/p>\n<div>\n<table style=\"width: 574px;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr valign=\"top\">\n<td width=\"196\">Attending as Representatives of Organisations<\/td>\n<td width=\"233\">Attending in Personal Capacity (Names of organisation are places of work)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr valign=\"top\">\n<td>Harish Pillay, Internet Society<\/td>\n<td>Caleb Kow, TuCows, Inc<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr valign=\"top\">\n<td>Goh Lih Shiun, Asia Internet Coalition<\/td>\n<td>George Goh<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr valign=\"top\">\n<td>Steven Liew, Asia Internet Coalition<\/td>\n<td>Bryan Ghows, VIA Law Corporation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr valign=\"top\">\n<td>Bryan Tan, Internet Society<\/td>\n<td>Ang Peng Hwa, NTU<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr valign=\"top\">\n<td>Benjamin Ang, Internet Society<\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Rationale for the Need of the Amendment<\/h2>\n<p>Is there a need for the Amendment? The notice-and-take-down regime has worked well in many other countries. It is not clear that it is not working well in Singapore.<\/p>\n<p>There is no data showing, for example, that ISPs are ignoring rights holders when served with take-down notices. Some of the online companies see invalid take-down notices.<\/p>\n<p>UK, for example, after much debate, has decided not to introduce the law. (See \u201cGovernment Drops Website Blocking\u201d BBC News, August 3, 2011, http:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/technology-14372698.)<\/p>\n<h2>Unintended Consequences<\/h2>\n<p>The Amendment will protect incumbent rights holders but it may have unintended consequences of stifling new technologies.<\/p>\n<p>The Amendment will discourage business owners from developing a robust notice-and-take-down system as they will now wait for the court order. The notice-and-take-down regime is readily accepted as a current practice.<\/p>\n<h2>Exceptions<\/h2>\n<p>Copyright law always has exceptions but there are none in this, eg fair dealing, non-commercial use, creative commons licensed material.<\/p>\n<h2>Site-Blocking<\/h2>\n<p>Site blocking is ineffective as VPNs (virtual private networks) TOR (The Onion Router) networks would make it possible to bypass the site blocking.<\/p>\n<h2>Permanence of Injunction<\/h2>\n<p>Copyright has a limited lifespan. So while it is efficient for the rights holder, it is not conceptually sound. There should be an expiry period for the injunction.<\/p>\n<h2>Recourse For Wrongly Blocked Sites<\/h2>\n<p>There should be recourse to sue for damages from those who wrongly claim copyright.<\/p>\n<h2>Better Ways<\/h2>\n<p>Encouragement should be made for diverse and flexible ways to deliver content to users.<\/p>\n<h2>Legal Process<\/h2>\n<p>It is possible for someone wanting to block the site to go straight to court with little warning to the possibly offending site. It is likely that once the rights holder has a court order, other sites will fold when presented with the court order. This bypasses legal due process.<\/p>\n<p>ICANN has a Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) process for handling domain names used for illegal purposes. The Amendment may conflict with this URS process.<\/p>\n<p>Rights holder should prove that actual infringement has taken place.<\/p>\n<p>There is the danger of overblocking. Any block should be of<a name=\"_GoBack\"><\/a>\u00a0the infringing page, not the entire site.<\/p>\n<h2>Better Wording<\/h2>\n<p>The definition of what is an ISP should be made clearer. It may be necessary to spell out what is excluded: platforms such as Yahoo, Google and Facebook, domain name registrars and cyberlockers (eg DropBox).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Public Consultation on the Proposed Amendments to the Copyright Act: Feedback at a Meeting Organised by the Internet Society and the Asian Internet Coalition Venue: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":846,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-850","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-7","category-events"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/isocsg.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/850","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/isocsg.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/isocsg.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/isocsg.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/isocsg.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=850"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/isocsg.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/850\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/isocsg.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/846"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/isocsg.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=850"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/isocsg.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=850"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/isocsg.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=850"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}